Acquisition Cost

During dinner last night, our phone rang and on the other line was a cigarette-smoking man. He wanted a few minutes of my time to explain that he works for Arbitron, a marketing research firm. He pitched his story that all I’d have to do is carry a diary with me and write down which radio stations I listen to, the duration, for one week. In exchange I’d get paid. The rest of our conversation went like this:

shmula:
So, how much will I get paid for doing this?
cigarette-smoking man:
The price of a cup of coffee at McDonald’s, not Starbucks.
shmula:
Okay, how much is that?
cigarette-smoking man:
That’s about $0.79 plus tax.
shmula:
Oh, so you’ll give me a buck for my troubles.
cigarette-smoking man:
Yes, sir. What was your address again?
shmula:
CLICK

I understand the need to manage acquisition costs, but $1.00 for my time to provide great ethnographic data? This was a bad customer experience.

What could Arbitron have done differently?

For one, instead of offering a cash gift, they could’ve offered something else with a higher perceived value, but with actual low actual value. An example of this is airline mileage — to the airline these rewards have very little actual value, but to the customer they have a higher perceived value.

For another, they also could even offer nothing as a reward. I probably would’ve even considered that more than the measly $1.00 they offered. The $1.00 was almost insulting. At least doing it for free would’ve felt altruistic, but doing the study for $1.00 just felt greasy.

Lesson learned: companies can be more creative in their quest for data and in their quest to acquire customers. The perceived value approach is a good one as is the altruistic approach (for data). But, if a company is seeking to offer a cash reward for insightful ethnographic or marketing research data, please at least offer something that’s not insulting or greasy-feeling. Otherwise, just ask for the data and offer nothing at all or offer some gift that has a perceived value but low or no actual value.


Short URL: http://bit.ly/uqqq

Share This Post:



  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • email

2-pizza teams (10)
3 C's (3)
37signals (1)
5S (38)
A3 Report (9)
adoption (7)
agile/software (59)
ajax (4)
amazon (53)
apple (3)
apple iphone (7)
axiom (3)
Aza Raskin (9)
backcountry.com (2)
berlin (1)
bill gates (1)
bill marriott (1)
blog tag (1)
book reviews (4)
bullwhip effect (5)
business (397)
business plans (3)
busm361 (13)
BzzAgent (12)
call center and queueing (11)
car buying (2)
Carbonite (1)
change management (5)
chicago (1)
click fraud (1)
click-to-ship (21)
clocky (2)
colin powell (2)
community (2)
company interviews (18)
company interviews (6)
complexity (32)
costs (8)
culture (7)
customer experience (10)
customer obsession (52)
customer recovery function (1)
customer segmentation (8)
customer service (17)
design thinking (14)
digg (4)
drum-buffer-rope (38)
dublin (1)
dynamic systems (24)
eBay (6)
economics (3)
efficiency (4)
ethnography (29)
family (18)
featuritis (15)
flexibility (1)
forecasting (2)
four performance dimensions (2)
Fun With The 2×2 Matrix (1)
game theory (7)
Gemba (67)
genchi genbutsu (68)
general (135)
germany (1)
google (15)
Gretchen Rubin (1)
heijunka (65)
holidays (1)
hoshin kanri (1)
how to be a human (1)
IDEO (2)
image uploading (1)
interviews (4)
iphone (5)
ishikawa (69)
IT at Toyota (67)
jason fried (1)
just-in-time (4)
kaizen (4)
kanban (46)
law of instinct (1)
Leadership (46)
lean (167)
Lean Consumption Maps (98)
learning curve (1)
licketyship (1)
mark cuban (1)
martin luther king (1)
mary poppendieck (1)
metrics (73)
microsoft (6)
milton friedman (1)
moving average (1)
muda (68)
nba fines (1)
net promoter score (nps) (1)
obeya (39)
Off-Topic (1)
onstar (1)
operations (108)
pageviews (3)
pareto principle (39)
patent (1)
peanut butter manifesto (2)
philosophy (3)
Poka-Yoke (6)
poppendieck (3)
powerpoint sucks (2)
private equity (4)
process measures (6)
product development (20)
productivity (4)
quality (41)
quasimodal design (1)
queueing theory (41)
Raffle (1)
rational choice (2)
regression analysis (18)
respect for people (6)
root cause analysis (60)
sarah+palin (2)
seth godin (1)
simplicity principle (10)
six sigma (128)
snowboarding (2)
social media (3)
spam (1)
statistical process control (46)
strategy (46)
suburban (1)
supply chain (24)
takt time (8)
teaching (2)
team size (9)
technology (104)
the beer distribution game (1)
The Happiness Project (1)
the profit tree (7)
The Visual Factory (11)
theory of constraints (41)
time (2)
timeline (3)
tony+hsieh (11)
toyota (75)
travel (1)
trump bankruptcy (1)
turnaround (5)
twitter (8)
uspto (1)
utah deal flow (2)
variation (69)
venture capital (1)
Visual Management (11)
waste (59)
website traffic (2)
Wing Chun (2)
wisdom of crowds (1)
wisdom teeth (1)
word-of-mouth marketing (18)
yahoo (2)
zappos.com (12)
zero defects (3)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

I’ll give you $1.50 to provide me with that data.

I actually cannot even believe that they would do that. Phone calls never work anyway. Cold-calling is such a poor way of generating business or interest. They would have had better luck if they hung out in a mall and asked folks that same question. They could have done it for free or even provided a $5 gift certificate to Starbucks.

Funny because on their website it shows that they have a “portable people meter” that they use. Obviously they still rely on a clipboard. I just can’t beleive they are that cheap.

[...] I understand the need to manage acquisition costs, but $1.00 for my time to provide great ethnographic data? This was a bad customer experience. What could Arbitron have done differently? For one, instead of offering a cash gift, …Read more: here [...]

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType