Why Transformation Efforts Fail

This entry is part 2 of 6 in the series Turnaround, Transformation, and Change Management

adoption, International, Domestic, Waiting, child, baby, infant, adoption, adopt, adopting, adoptionTransformation or Change efforts sometimes fail.  In fact, the numbers are staggering – most of them fail.  While the root cause is wide and varied, there are general themes or characteristics that are important to keep in mind in your own transformation efforts.  Think of these as symptoms also — that a failure is around the corner if you see these characteristics creeping-up or, better yet, you can course-correct if there’s still time.

The data on Transformation failures is instructive:

click to enlarge image

shmula-transformation-failure

The main categories for why Transformations fail are 1:

The top two reasons are instructive and actionable – the root causes for most transformation failures have to do with people: employee resistance and management behavior.

Management Behavior that is not supportive of the change and Employee Resistance are the main factors that lead to transformation failures

Typical characteristics in transformation failures are the following:

In the next post, we’ll discuss how to surgically address the failure characteristics above, create a transformation story that is rigorously architected along broad themes, the chapters in that story, and the key initiatives that those chapters produce, and the role of the leadership team in all of it.

Beer and Nohria (2000); Cameron and Quinn (1997); CSC Index; Caldewell (1994); Gross et al. (1993); Kotter and Heskett (1992); Hickings (1988); Conference Board report (Fortune 500 interviews); press analysis; McKinsey analysis
  1. Beer and Nohria (2000); Cameron and Quinn (1997); CSC Index; Caldewell (1994); Gross et al. (1993); Kotter and Heskett (1992); Hickings (1988); Conference Board report (Fortune 500 interviews); press analysis; McKinsey analysis
Series Navigation«Turnaround and Change Management: Do Not Waste a Good CrisisA Transformation Story»

Short URL: http://bit.ly/GBCef

Share This Post:



  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • email

2-pizza teams (10)
3 C's (3)
5S (38)
A3 Report (9)
adoption (7)
agile/software (59)
ajax (4)
amazon (53)
apple (3)
apple iphone (7)
axiom (3)
Aza Raskin (9)
backcountry.com (2)
berlin (1)
bill gates (1)
bill marriott (1)
blog tag (1)
book reviews (4)
bullwhip effect (5)
business (394)
business plans (3)
busm361 (13)
BzzAgent (12)
call center and queueing (11)
car buying (2)
Carbonite (1)
change management (5)
chicago (1)
click fraud (1)
click-to-ship (21)
clocky (2)
colin powell (2)
community (2)
company interviews (18)
company interviews (6)
complexity (32)
costs (8)
culture (7)
customer experience (10)
customer obsession (52)
customer recovery function (1)
customer segmentation (8)
customer service (17)
design thinking (14)
digg (4)
drum-buffer-rope (38)
dublin (1)
dynamic systems (24)
eBay (6)
economics (3)
efficiency (4)
ethnography (29)
family (18)
featuritis (15)
flexibility (1)
forecasting (2)
four performance dimensions (2)
Fun With The 2×2 Matrix (1)
game theory (7)
Gemba (67)
genchi genbutsu (68)
general (135)
germany (1)
google (15)
heijunka (65)
holidays (1)
hoshin kanri (1)
how to be a human (1)
IDEO (2)
image uploading (1)
iphone (5)
ishikawa (69)
IT at Toyota (67)
just-in-time (4)
kaizen (4)
kanban (46)
law of instinct (1)
Leadership (43)
lean (165)
Lean Consumption Maps (98)
learning curve (1)
licketyship (1)
mark cuban (1)
martin luther king (1)
mary poppendieck (1)
metrics (73)
microsoft (6)
milton friedman (1)
moving average (1)
muda (68)
nba fines (1)
net promoter score (nps) (1)
obeya (39)
Off-Topic (1)
onstar (1)
operations (108)
pageviews (3)
pareto principle (39)
patent (1)
peanut butter manifesto (2)
philosophy (3)
Poka-Yoke (6)
poppendieck (3)
powerpoint sucks (2)
private equity (4)
process measures (6)
product development (20)
productivity (4)
quality (41)
quasimodal design (1)
queueing theory (41)
Raffle (1)
rational choice (2)
regression analysis (18)
respect for people (6)
root cause analysis (60)
sarah+palin (2)
seth godin (1)
simplicity principle (10)
six sigma (128)
snowboarding (2)
social media (3)
spam (1)
statistical process control (46)
strategy (46)
suburban (1)
supply chain (24)
takt time (8)
teaching (2)
team size (9)
technology (104)
the beer distribution game (1)
the profit tree (7)
The Visual Factory (11)
theory of constraints (41)
time (2)
timeline (3)
tony+hsieh (11)
toyota (75)
travel (1)
trump bankruptcy (1)
turnaround (5)
twitter (8)
uspto (1)
utah deal flow (2)
variation (69)
venture capital (1)
Visual Management (11)
waste (59)
website traffic (2)
Wing Chun (2)
wisdom of crowds (1)
wisdom teeth (1)
word-of-mouth marketing (18)
yahoo (2)
zappos.com (12)
zero defects (3)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

blog post: Why Transformation Efforts Fail http://tinyurl.com/ycrsteh

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

I disagree with the data, not that it’s real data, but that they are not causes of the failure. They sound more like excuses to me.

Employees resist change…first, most employees crave change, deeply. What they resist is fear that the change will be worse or that it will make their lives more difficult. And this is a universal condition so it can’t be a reason that your change failed and someone else’s succeeded. Maybe you didn’t sell it well enough, maybe it sounded good on paper but failed in execution, but resistance wasn’t the cause.

Lack of resources isn’t a cause either, it’s a complaint. You have what you have. You failed to plan around the resources you have.

What is really see in the data is a failure to reflect.

Jamie Flinchbaugh
Jamieflinchbaugh.com

RT @shmula: blog post: Why Transformation Efforts Fail http://tinyurl.com/ycrsteh

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

I really like your point about “The informal ‘how things get done’ remain inconsistent with espoused values”.

I have seen many times when top management has espoused values they speak all of the time but they either turn a blind eye when when they see informal ways of doing stuff or worse never even go and see what is really happening.

Hi Jamie,

Thanks for your input and for taking the time to share it.

I haven’t been critical of Mckinsey’s data, but it actually makes sense to me. Your point on Employee’s resisting change is very good – it’s actually more of a failure of getting the right buy-in and in selling to the broader constituency. I agree with you.

Deming would go as far as saying that everything is the fault of the Leadership team – perhaps he is right now even as he was right even back then.

Why Transformation Efforts Fail | shmula http://bit.ly/15NdGt

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Interesting data on way transformation/change efforts fail: http://bit.ly/41lO4c @innovate–what do you think?

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Reading: “Good post and comments on Why Transformation Efforts Fail” (http://twitthis.com/x3kbwu)

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Great article on blog on why lean transformations fail http://bit.ly/GBCef thx for the link @flinchbaugh

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Why Transformation Efforts Fail http://tinyurl.com/ycsmeqp

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Recently I’ve been hearing some arguments that suggest that change programs are sometimes too slow and deliberate. Clearly there is a balance to be struck between going too fast too soon, but the basic thrust of this argument was that the longer you take, the less relevant your original program is likely to be given the increased probability of changing circumstances

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType