Queueing Theory: Part 4
This post is part of a series on Queueing Theory. The other articles can be found here:
- Queueing Theory: Part 1
- Queueing Theory: Part 2
- Queueing Theory: Part 3
- Queueing Theory: Part 4
- What is Waste?
- On Time-Traps and Waste
- Call Centers as Queueing Systems
- Travel Time & Waste
- Little’s Law for Product Development
Some of the physics and technical aspects of Queues are covered in the articles above. Today, I’d like to spend a minute on the Psychology of Queues.
There are a few key behavioral responses or reactions to queues, or waiting. Below are the propositions:
- Unoccupied time feels longer than occupied time.
- Process-waits feel longer than in-process waits.
- Anxiety makes waits seem longer.
- Uncertain waits seem longer than known, finite waits.
- Unfair waits are longer than equitable waits.
- The more valuable the service, the longer the customer is willing to wait.
- Solo waits feel longer than group waits.
There are several aspects to managing the Physics of Queueing and the Psychology of Queueing.
Managing the Physics of Queueing
In large part, the Queueing articles above focus on the learning and understanding the quantitative aspects of Queueing System behavior. In a later post, I’ll spend some time on ways one can manage the Physics of Queueing — for example, how to manage Work-in-Process (WIP) or Things-in-Process (TIP) for non-manufacturing processes; identifying the right batch size; identifying and reducing or eliminating time-traps, etc.
Managing the Psychology of Queueing
After, I’ll spend a few minutes explaining ways in which a manager can manage the Psychology of Queueing — for example, visual taskboards, effective feedback loops, rapid and iterative software development with frequent and communicated release cycles are just some examples of how to effectively manage the Psychology of Queues.
Applications
In each treatment of Queueing, I will also show how to manage the Physics and Psychology of Queueing and show how you can apply them to Software Engineering, Manufacturing, Medicine, Call Centers, and Fulfillment.
Conclusion
Understanding the behavior of a system is what Queueing Theory and Little’s Law is all about. But, managing a Queue requires not just understanding the behavior of a system, but also in-depth knowledge of how to improve a system — improving both aspects of Queueing will mean a better, more efficient and cost-effective system and, more importantly, a much better customer experience.
*photo originally uploaded by picturejockey



shmula » What is Waste? said,
October 18, 2006 @ 12:00 pm
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]
shmula » Travel Time & Waste : business, operations management, technology, and stuff in between said,
October 31, 2006 @ 11:05 am
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]
shmula » queueing theory: part 2+ : business, operations management, technology, and stuff in between said,
November 1, 2006 @ 11:27 am
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]
shmula » Why People Visit Amazon.com : Business, Technology, and Stuff in Between said,
December 28, 2006 @ 2:14 pm
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]
Lean and Six Sigma at Amazon.com | shmula said,
April 10, 2008 @ 9:45 pm
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]
Lean and Six Sigma Summit | shmula said,
April 13, 2008 @ 5:04 pm
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]
On Customer Obsession | shmula said,
April 15, 2008 @ 10:58 am
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]
Customers Feel the Difference, Not the Average | shmula said,
April 23, 2008 @ 1:26 am
[...] Queueing Theory: Part 4 [...]