Consensus, Committees, Paralysis, & Digraphs

If your organization leans more towards Consensus, rather than leadership actually providing, well, leadership from the top-down, then you’ve probably experienced the scenario where nobody can agree and so nobody makes a decision.  I call this state-of-affairs an organizational paralysis. True, there’s something to be said for the executives that allow management to make business decisions — personally, I prefer a lot of autonomy to get things done — but, in some organizations, poor leadership leads to no decisions, no consensus, and nothing worthwhile gets done.

If your organization is consensus-based and you often find yourself in an organizational paralysis, then Digraphing might be for you.

Digraphs

Digraphing is a simple prioritization process based on reducing the decision process to (3) choices.

Here are the steps to creating a Digraph:

  1. Write down your choices in an octagonal shape. It might be helpful also to write your choices down on sticky-notes and form the octagonal shape.  Note: Do not have too many choices, otherwise this excercise could take very, very long.
  2. Then, as a group, pit each choice against the other. Ask person 1 “A or B”, and then draw an Arrow into her answer. Do this excercise for all the possible combinations and for each person in the group.
  3. Sum the number of inbound arrows and sort the items from highest to lowest.

Here is a visual representation of a Digraph:

shmula.com, digraph

shmula.com, kumbaya managementIn the example above, Item B had the most inbound arrows, which represents the collective consensus of the group that Item B is highest in priority.

A Note on Kumbaya Management

I have spoken about Kumbaya Management before. Decision, Innovation, and pretty much a lot of other things — done by committee — do not result in a breakthrough or innovative outcome. Instead, you end up with a mediocre outcome quasi-agreed to by the group. Digraphing can solve the Kumbaya problem, if the choices are good. Otherwise, you’ll have decision and prioritization made on poor choices. Use wisdom, but be decisive in your groups. If there isn’t a command-and-control or even basic leadership in your organization, then it’s up to you to make the decisions that your executives aren’t either willing or capable of making. digraphing can help you prioritize the choices into small, workable, action items.

Share This Post:



  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • FriendFeed
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • MySpace
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

2-pizza teams (9)
3 C's (3)
5S (37)
A3 Report (9)
adoption (6)
agile/software (59)
ajax (4)
amazon (50)
apple (2)
apple iphone (6)
axiom (3)
Aza Raskin (8)
backcountry.com (2)
berlin (1)
bill gates (1)
bill marriott (1)
blog tag (1)
book reviews (4)
bullwhip effect (5)
business (381)
business plans (3)
busm361 (13)
BzzAgent (12)
call center and queueing (11)
car buying (2)
Carbonite (1)
chicago (1)
click fraud (1)
click-to-ship (21)
clocky (2)
colin powell (2)
community (2)
company interviews (18)
company interviews (6)
complexity (32)
costs (8)
culture (1)
customer experience (4)
customer obsession (45)
customer segmentation (8)
customer service (13)
design thinking (11)
digg (4)
drum-buffer-rope (38)
dublin (1)
dynamic systems (24)
eBay (6)
economics (3)
efficiency (3)
ethnography (28)
family (18)
featuritis (15)
flexibility (1)
forecasting (2)
four performance dimensions (2)
Fun With The 2×2 Matrix (1)
game theory (7)
Gemba (60)
genchi genbutsu (65)
general (136)
germany (1)
google (15)
heijunka (64)
holidays (1)
how to be a human (1)
image uploading (1)
iphone (4)
ishikawa (67)
IT at Toyota (66)
just-in-time (4)
kaizen (1)
kanban (42)
law of instinct (1)
Leadership (33)
lean (148)
Lean Consumption Maps (94)
learning curve (1)
licketyship (1)
mark cuban (1)
martin luther king (1)
mary poppendieck (1)
metrics (73)
microsoft (6)
milton friedman (1)
moving average (1)
muda (64)
nba fines (1)
net promoter score (nps) (1)
obeya (36)
Off-Topic (1)
onstar (1)
operations (108)
pageviews (3)
pareto principle (38)
patent (1)
peanut butter manifesto (2)
philosophy (3)
Poka-Yoke (3)
poppendieck (3)
powerpoint sucks (2)
private equity (4)
process measures (5)
product development (19)
productivity (4)
quality (39)
queueing theory (40)
Raffle (1)
rational choice (2)
regression analysis (18)
respect for people (3)
root cause analysis (56)
sarah+palin (2)
seth godin (1)
simplicity principle (10)
six sigma (122)
snowboarding (2)
social media (3)
spam (1)
statistical process control (46)
strategy (44)
suburban (1)
supply chain (24)
takt time (8)
teaching (2)
team size (9)
technology (105)
the beer distribution game (1)
the profit tree (7)
The Visual Factory (11)
theory of constraints (41)
time (2)
timeline (3)
tony+hsieh (9)
toyota (73)
travel (1)
trump bankruptcy (1)
twitter (8)
uspto (1)
utah deal flow (2)
variation (69)
venture capital (1)
Visual Management (9)
waste (56)
website traffic (2)
Wing Chun (2)
wisdom of crowds (1)
wisdom teeth (1)
word-of-mouth marketing (18)
yahoo (2)
zappos.com (9)
zero defects (3)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

Peter,

This is a very effective way to visualize “card sorting”, but it introduces a problem when trying to aggregate inputs from multiple people – it drowns out the “best ideas” and tends to promote the lowest common denominator of features. I wrote about this in the linked article.

I wonder if there is a way to augment this approach so that “passion” is not lost.

[...] Consensus, Committees, Par… [...]

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType