On Queueing and Elevator Mirrors
- queueing theory: part 1
- On Queueing, Oil Change, and Customer Experience
- Queueing Theory: Part 4
- On Time-Traps and Waste
- queueing theory: part 2+
- Queueing Theory: Part 3
- Little’s Law for Product Development
- Psychology of Queueing & Build-A-Bear Workshop
- Travel Time & Waste
- Call Centers as Queueing Systems
- What is Waste?
- YouTube’s Queueing Properties
- Queueing Theory and Terrorism
- Queueing, Disneyland, and FastPass
- Psychology of Queueing & Disneyland
- Multi-Tasking Leads to Lower Productivity
- Queueing Psychology at the Gas Pump
- On Queueing and Elevator Mirrors
- The Variability Tree
- Attitude and the Pyschology of Queueing
- Emergency Room (ER) Wait Times
- Staring at Acoustic Ceiling Tiles
I went to California earlier this week for business. I rode in an elevator and that experience reminded me of a simple, yet effective way to aleviate the negative feelings that accompany waiting, or the Psychology of Queueing — mirrors in an elevator.
There are a few key behavioral responses or reactions to queues, or waiting. Below are the propositions for the Psychology of Queueing:
- Unoccupied time feels longer than occupied time.
- Process-waits feel longer than in-process waits.
- Anxiety makes waits seem longer.
- Uncertain waits seem longer than known, finite waits.
- Unfair waits are longer than equitable waits.
- The more valuable the service, the longer the customer is willing to wait.
- Solo waits feel longer than group waits.
Elevator mirrors, indeed, help to alleviate the negative feelings that often accompany waiting. Mirrors in an elevator can even be turned into something fun, as these flickr photos show.
There are many, many easy, non-technology, tools to help reduce the negative feelings that come with waiting. Once the basic principles are understood in regards to the Psychology of Queueing, then it takes just some creativity to implement tools that satisfy the criteria above.
This post is part of a series on Queueing Theory. Other articles can be found here:
- Queueing Theory: Part 1
- Queueing Theory: Part 2
- Queueing Theory: Part 3
- Queueing Theory: Part 4
- What is Waste?
- On Time-Traps and Waste
- Call Centers as Queueing Systems
- Travel Time & Waste
- Little’s Law for Product Development
- YouTube’s Queueing Properties
- Psychology of Queueing and Disneyland
- Queueing, Disneyland, and FastPass
- Multi-Tasking Leads to Lower Productivity
- Queueing Theory and Terrorism
- On Queueing Theory and Elevator Mirrors
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Additional comments powered by BackType
The psychology of waiting sometimes overrides queuing efficiency. Supermarket checkout lines are a great example. Individual queues for each checker is the inefficient approach but it is almost universally used. The abundance of impulse purchase goods, trashy magazines and now flat panel looping ads shows that grocery stores prefer this inefficient model.
There is a Whole Paycheck err… Whole Foods near where I live that during peak periods will actually rope off the individual queues and line everyone up into a single queue (they do this because the individual queue start stretching down the aisles and cause grid lock). This invariably makes the shopper grumpy but is significantly faster.
Who knew there was a whole genre of elevator mirror pictures… good stuff.