The Flateto Principle

As opposed to a Pareto, where the picture of the data shows a nice stratification and separation in the data, a Flateto is exactly the opposite: the visual picture is one where there is no separation — all the bars are of equal length.  Essentially, a Flateto doesn’t tell us where to spend our time or energies. 

Below is a good example of a Pareto — the exact opposite of a Flateto:

(source)

The above picture shows that the majority of the processing time for a process was being spent in travel. 

A Flateto, on the other hand, would have showed that processing time are roughly the same across all category types.  Indeed, a Flateto doesn’t tell us much or help us focus on the right things.  Whereas, the Pareto above tells us that if we were to reduce processing time for the process above, then we ought to take a serious look at the travel time category because, most likely, any improvements in that category would yield us and the team bigger results and ensures that we are focusing on the right category.

The Pareto

The Pareto Principle was named after an Italian economist who discovered that 80% of the wealth in Europe was concentrated in 20% of the population. This discovery is also known as the 80/20 rule or the Law of the Vital Few. The Pareto Principle is a phenomenon that finds application in many places, such as software engineering, quality, manufacturing, word-of-mouth marketing, human resources, and government; the 80/20 rule was also popularized by the book “The Mckinsey Way” as a principle by which Mckinsey consultants follow to solve client problems.

A result of the Pareto Principle is the Pareto Chart. The Pareto Chart is used to graphically summarize and display the relative importance of the differences between groups of data, or to visually represent the Vital Few versus the Trivial Many.

You can create a Pareto Chart in any statistical tool such as GNU Plot, MatLab, Mathematica, Stata, SAS, or MiniTab. For our example, I’ll show how to create a Pareto Chart in Excel.

To create a Pareto Chart in Excel, setup a spreadsheet such that the first column contains the categories of your data, the second columns, percentages of each category, and the third column cumulative percentages of each category. The example below represents data collected on the number of citations issued by police for various violations (Category) in a particular intersection. Overall, 300 tickets were issued for various traffic violations. The percentage of tickets issued for each violation and the cumulative percentage of tickets issued were calculated and entered into an Excel spreadsheet. If the data is not sorted from high to low, then sort the data from the highest percentage to the lowest. The sequence for sorting is “Data”, “Sort”, “Percent”, “Descending”.

www.shmula.com, pareto chart

Then, highlight “Categories”, “Percent”, and “Cumulative Percent” Columns. Go to the Chart Wizard, select “Custom Types” and select “Line-Columns”.

www.shmula.com, pareto chart

In my line of work, I use the Pareto Principle all the time. As an example, at Amazon, I used the Pareto Principle to seperate the value-added time in a process versus the non-value added time. This approach would help direct efforts on where to spend our time to improve a process. The Pareto Chart is a nice and easy way to visually display the data and direct efforts.

Examples of Pareto Phenomenon

To apply the Pareto Principle more broadly, as a general rule, it’s important to remember that roughly 20% of our daily activities matter. Or, put another way, let us focus our energies and time on the 20% that will make an impact on the other 80%.


Short URL: http://bit.ly/OK7D

Share This Post:



  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • email

2-pizza teams (10)
3 C's (3)
37signals (1)
5S (38)
A3 Report (9)
adoption (7)
agile/software (59)
ajax (4)
amazon (53)
apple (3)
apple iphone (7)
axiom (3)
Aza Raskin (9)
backcountry.com (2)
berlin (1)
bill gates (1)
bill marriott (1)
blog tag (1)
book reviews (4)
bullwhip effect (5)
business (397)
business plans (3)
busm361 (13)
BzzAgent (12)
call center and queueing (11)
car buying (2)
Carbonite (1)
change management (5)
chicago (1)
click fraud (1)
click-to-ship (21)
clocky (2)
colin powell (2)
community (2)
company interviews (18)
company interviews (6)
complexity (32)
costs (8)
culture (7)
customer experience (10)
customer obsession (52)
customer recovery function (1)
customer segmentation (8)
customer service (17)
design thinking (14)
digg (4)
drum-buffer-rope (38)
dublin (1)
dynamic systems (24)
eBay (6)
economics (3)
efficiency (4)
ethnography (29)
family (18)
featuritis (15)
flexibility (1)
forecasting (2)
four performance dimensions (2)
Fun With The 2×2 Matrix (1)
game theory (7)
Gemba (67)
genchi genbutsu (68)
general (135)
germany (1)
google (15)
Gretchen Rubin (1)
heijunka (65)
holidays (1)
hoshin kanri (1)
how to be a human (1)
IDEO (2)
image uploading (1)
interviews (4)
iphone (5)
ishikawa (69)
IT at Toyota (67)
jason fried (1)
just-in-time (4)
kaizen (4)
kanban (46)
law of instinct (1)
Leadership (46)
lean (167)
Lean Consumption Maps (98)
learning curve (1)
licketyship (1)
mark cuban (1)
martin luther king (1)
mary poppendieck (1)
metrics (73)
microsoft (6)
milton friedman (1)
moving average (1)
muda (68)
nba fines (1)
net promoter score (nps) (1)
obeya (39)
Off-Topic (1)
onstar (1)
operations (108)
pageviews (3)
pareto principle (39)
patent (1)
peanut butter manifesto (2)
philosophy (3)
Poka-Yoke (6)
poppendieck (3)
powerpoint sucks (2)
private equity (4)
process measures (6)
product development (20)
productivity (4)
quality (41)
quasimodal design (1)
queueing theory (41)
Raffle (1)
rational choice (2)
regression analysis (18)
respect for people (6)
root cause analysis (60)
sarah+palin (2)
seth godin (1)
simplicity principle (10)
six sigma (128)
snowboarding (2)
social media (3)
spam (1)
statistical process control (46)
strategy (46)
suburban (1)
supply chain (24)
takt time (8)
teaching (2)
team size (9)
technology (104)
the beer distribution game (1)
The Happiness Project (1)
the profit tree (7)
The Visual Factory (11)
theory of constraints (41)
time (2)
timeline (3)
tony+hsieh (11)
toyota (75)
travel (1)
trump bankruptcy (1)
turnaround (5)
twitter (8)
uspto (1)
utah deal flow (2)
variation (69)
venture capital (1)
Visual Management (11)
waste (59)
website traffic (2)
Wing Chun (2)
wisdom of crowds (1)
wisdom teeth (1)
word-of-mouth marketing (18)
yahoo (2)
zappos.com (12)
zero defects (3)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

After working with these ideas for quite some time, one tends to think they are very basic and widely known. Everyday life and reading the papers (especially politics) always prove me wrong.

It is incredible to see how much time and money go down the drain while trying to solve non important issues.

[...] Lean manufacturing is great! It’s all about ping-pong, football tables, EBay and elephants. But God help you if you haven’t already implemented it, flateto analysis would show, especially if you live in Canada where the dollar is strong, that if you didn’t put it in place by 1995, don’t even bother , no matter what Nick Dieltsien says. [...]

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType