Queueing Psychology at the Gas Pump

This entry is part 17 of 21 in the series queueing theory

More and more gas stations have television displays that play commercials and T.V. shows as you pump gas.  While the primary motivation for these firms is to increase brand awareness through commercialization and penetration, this entertain-while-you-wait is also a manifestation of Queueing Psychology.

There are a few key behavioral responses or reactions to queues, or waiting.  Below are the propositions for the Psychology of Queueing:

  1. Unoccupied time feels longer than occupied time.
  2. Process-waits feel longer than in-process waits.
  3. Anxiety makes waits seem longer.
  4. Uncertain waits seem longer than known, finite waits.
  5. Unfair waits are longer than equitable waits.
  6. The more valuable the service, the longer the customer is willing to wait.
  7. Solo waits feel longer than group waits.

The gas pump process inevitably requires that we wait.  In many ways, this is a very smart move by both the gas companies and also the companies that provide the entertainment service.  A few questions:

Whether or not this approach will actually yield revenue for anybody, it’s an interesting manifestation of Queueing Psychology.

Below is a picture of two guys watching a show while waiting for their gas to stop pumping:

(source)

Below is a photo of a lady multi-tasking: she’s watching a show while she is about to pump gas:

(source)

+++++

This post is part of a series on Queueing Theory.  Other articles can be found here:

  1. Queueing Theory: Part 1
  2. Queueing Theory: Part 2
  3. Queueing Theory: Part 3
  4. Queueing Theory: Part 4
  5. What is Waste?
  6. On Time-Traps and Waste
  7. Call Centers as Queueing Systems
  8. Travel Time & Waste
  9. Little’s Law for Product Development
  10. YouTube’s Queueing Properties
  11. Psychology of Queueing and Disneyland
  12. Queueing, Disneyland, and FastPass
  13. Multi-Tasking Leads to Lower Productivity
  14. Queueing Theory and Terrorism
  15. On Queueing Theory and Elevator Mirrors
Series Navigation«Multi-Tasking Leads to Lower ProductivityOn Queueing and Elevator Mirrors»

Short URL: http://bit.ly/Zlwy

Share This Post:



  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • email

2-pizza teams (10)
3 C's (3)
5S (38)
A3 Report (9)
adoption (7)
agile/software (59)
ajax (4)
amazon (53)
apple (3)
apple iphone (7)
axiom (3)
Aza Raskin (9)
backcountry.com (2)
berlin (1)
bill gates (1)
bill marriott (1)
blog tag (1)
book reviews (4)
bullwhip effect (5)
business (394)
business plans (3)
busm361 (13)
BzzAgent (12)
call center and queueing (11)
car buying (2)
Carbonite (1)
change management (5)
chicago (1)
click fraud (1)
click-to-ship (21)
clocky (2)
colin powell (2)
community (2)
company interviews (18)
company interviews (6)
complexity (32)
costs (8)
culture (7)
customer experience (10)
customer obsession (52)
customer recovery function (1)
customer segmentation (8)
customer service (17)
design thinking (14)
digg (4)
drum-buffer-rope (38)
dublin (1)
dynamic systems (24)
eBay (6)
economics (3)
efficiency (4)
ethnography (29)
family (18)
featuritis (15)
flexibility (1)
forecasting (2)
four performance dimensions (2)
Fun With The 2×2 Matrix (1)
game theory (7)
Gemba (67)
genchi genbutsu (68)
general (135)
germany (1)
google (15)
heijunka (65)
holidays (1)
hoshin kanri (1)
how to be a human (1)
IDEO (2)
image uploading (1)
iphone (5)
ishikawa (69)
IT at Toyota (67)
just-in-time (4)
kaizen (4)
kanban (46)
law of instinct (1)
Leadership (43)
lean (165)
Lean Consumption Maps (98)
learning curve (1)
licketyship (1)
mark cuban (1)
martin luther king (1)
mary poppendieck (1)
metrics (73)
microsoft (6)
milton friedman (1)
moving average (1)
muda (68)
nba fines (1)
net promoter score (nps) (1)
obeya (39)
Off-Topic (1)
onstar (1)
operations (108)
pageviews (3)
pareto principle (39)
patent (1)
peanut butter manifesto (2)
philosophy (3)
Poka-Yoke (6)
poppendieck (3)
powerpoint sucks (2)
private equity (4)
process measures (6)
product development (20)
productivity (4)
quality (41)
quasimodal design (1)
queueing theory (41)
Raffle (1)
rational choice (2)
regression analysis (18)
respect for people (6)
root cause analysis (60)
sarah+palin (2)
seth godin (1)
simplicity principle (10)
six sigma (128)
snowboarding (2)
social media (3)
spam (1)
statistical process control (46)
strategy (46)
suburban (1)
supply chain (24)
takt time (8)
teaching (2)
team size (9)
technology (104)
the beer distribution game (1)
the profit tree (7)
The Visual Factory (11)
theory of constraints (41)
time (2)
timeline (3)
tony+hsieh (11)
toyota (75)
travel (1)
trump bankruptcy (1)
turnaround (5)
twitter (8)
uspto (1)
utah deal flow (2)
variation (69)
venture capital (1)
Visual Management (11)
waste (59)
website traffic (2)
Wing Chun (2)
wisdom of crowds (1)
wisdom teeth (1)
word-of-mouth marketing (18)
yahoo (2)
zappos.com (12)
zero defects (3)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

I’ve always felt silly that I figured out when I hang the pump back in its holder, the TV turns off and tells me to go pay the attendant. So now when it starts playing some CNN feature, I’ll hold the pump in my hand until the feature finishes, *then* hang it back. So not only was the wait uncertain, it was prolonged. If anyone at chevron hears this, they’ll try and figure out a way to charge me for that time, I’m sure.

My local gas station has an annoying audio program that plays while you pump, just promotional stuff for the station. There’s a mute button, thankfully.

I seems like the only programming that I get are the Jack in the Box adverts. I think that the concept of programming is a good one but I feel the execution is not being done well.
I also think that the concept has two big flaws. The first is that I don’t think that it is a driver to getting people to go to a certain station. I choose the station that I go to simply by which is the most convenient for me. I certainly don’t go back to a station in order to watch TV. The second flaw is that the TV is in the wrong location. When I get to the pump my queue time is effectively over and I am not in the process of actually doing “work” (not in a conventional sense but I am doing something besides waiting). The time that I am pumping is not a bother to be because I know how long I will be there. My frustration in the gas station queue is that I don’t know how long it will take for those in front of me to pump gas. That is the time that I need TV or jugglers or clowns (only kidding about the jugglers or clowns…or am I?).

james

Sometimes I go to a station to pump gas, but don’t fill up the whole way – maybe I think that gas will be cheaper somewhere else, or I don’t feel like waiting, or whatever. I wonder how many people will be more likely to fill up that wouldn’t have because they want to watch the show?

Also, in response to James, I could certainly see people going to a station because of the video, especially if it’s at all entertaining. Maybe not you or me, but it seems reasonable that there would be a market that would respond to that.

[...] I have really enjoyed learning more about the Queuing Theory from our friend, Peter Abilla, over at the excellent shmula blog. Peter’s most recent post is about the Queuing Psychology at the Gus Pump. [...]

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType