Kaizen-ed Out of a Job

I discovered a helpful site today, where one of the questions on the FAQ was: "Will I be Kaizen-ed out of a job?"  It’s a fair question.

Below is the answer given by the site:

Will I be kaizen-ed out of a job?
The single most common fear that operators have when learning about kaizen and waste elimination is that they will loose their job after a kaizen event. After all, isn’t labor the first waste listed (see preceding question).

On the surface, this concern seems to be valid. After all, if we are trying to reduce the waste in an operators work content (labor), is it not conceivable that eventually we will eliminate enough waste to reduce an entire person?

This is absolutely true. In fact, when following the kaizen mindset, headcount reduction could happen within week! However, we must not confuse elimination of work with the subsequent elimination of headcount.

In other words, if an operators work is eliminated, it does not mean that their job has to go with it. Instead, these individuals can be redeployed to other areas of the company… in identifying more waste for example. Of course, as attrition occurs (voluntary departures, retirements, etc…), it is perfectly acceptable not to rehire the position.

Consider this: eliminating waste through kaizen is performed by everyone in the company, including individual operators. If a company chooses to reduce headcount as soon as a person’s job is eliminated, it is quite possible that the zeal for additional kaizen will not be felt by the remaining workforce.

The bottom-line is this: when implementing proper Lean, the firm wil be able to do more with less.  "Less" might actually mean people.  If that is the case, then the firm should be honest up-front with the employees on its intention with the extra capacity it finds itself having after Lean is implemented properly.  The other option, of course, is to redirect the employees that find themselves with much less to do to some other meaningful position in the firm. 

Hat Tip [Lean Resources, Lean Training, Lean Consultants]

+++++

For articles on queueing theory, time-traps, operations, lean and six sigma, please visit the links below:


Short URL: http://bit.ly/yF1W

Share This Post:



  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • HackerNews
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • email

2-pizza teams (10)
3 C's (3)
37signals (1)
5S (38)
A3 Report (9)
adoption (7)
agile/software (59)
ajax (4)
amazon (53)
apple (3)
apple iphone (7)
axiom (3)
Aza Raskin (9)
backcountry.com (2)
berlin (1)
bill gates (1)
bill marriott (1)
blog tag (1)
book reviews (4)
bullwhip effect (5)
business (397)
business plans (3)
busm361 (13)
BzzAgent (12)
call center and queueing (11)
car buying (2)
Carbonite (1)
change management (5)
chicago (1)
click fraud (1)
click-to-ship (21)
clocky (2)
colin powell (2)
community (2)
company interviews (18)
company interviews (6)
complexity (32)
costs (8)
culture (7)
customer experience (10)
customer obsession (52)
customer recovery function (1)
customer segmentation (8)
customer service (17)
design thinking (14)
digg (4)
drum-buffer-rope (38)
dublin (1)
dynamic systems (24)
eBay (6)
economics (3)
efficiency (4)
ethnography (29)
family (18)
featuritis (15)
flexibility (1)
forecasting (2)
four performance dimensions (2)
Fun With The 2×2 Matrix (1)
game theory (7)
Gemba (67)
genchi genbutsu (68)
general (135)
germany (1)
google (15)
Gretchen Rubin (1)
heijunka (65)
holidays (1)
hoshin kanri (1)
how to be a human (1)
IDEO (2)
image uploading (1)
interviews (4)
iphone (5)
ishikawa (69)
IT at Toyota (67)
jason fried (1)
just-in-time (4)
kaizen (4)
kanban (46)
law of instinct (1)
Leadership (46)
lean (167)
Lean Consumption Maps (98)
learning curve (1)
licketyship (1)
mark cuban (1)
martin luther king (1)
mary poppendieck (1)
metrics (73)
microsoft (6)
milton friedman (1)
moving average (1)
muda (68)
nba fines (1)
net promoter score (nps) (1)
obeya (39)
Off-Topic (1)
onstar (1)
operations (108)
pageviews (3)
pareto principle (39)
patent (1)
peanut butter manifesto (2)
philosophy (3)
Poka-Yoke (6)
poppendieck (3)
powerpoint sucks (2)
private equity (4)
process measures (6)
product development (20)
productivity (4)
quality (41)
quasimodal design (1)
queueing theory (41)
Raffle (1)
rational choice (2)
regression analysis (18)
respect for people (6)
root cause analysis (60)
sarah+palin (2)
seth godin (1)
simplicity principle (10)
six sigma (128)
snowboarding (2)
social media (3)
spam (1)
statistical process control (46)
strategy (46)
suburban (1)
supply chain (24)
takt time (8)
teaching (2)
team size (9)
technology (104)
the beer distribution game (1)
The Happiness Project (1)
the profit tree (7)
The Visual Factory (11)
theory of constraints (41)
time (2)
timeline (3)
tony+hsieh (11)
toyota (75)
travel (1)
trump bankruptcy (1)
turnaround (5)
twitter (8)
uspto (1)
utah deal flow (2)
variation (69)
venture capital (1)
Visual Management (11)
waste (59)
website traffic (2)
Wing Chun (2)
wisdom of crowds (1)
wisdom teeth (1)
word-of-mouth marketing (18)
yahoo (2)
zappos.com (12)
zero defects (3)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

I agree with your comments here, however, even Toyota sometimes has to layoff temporary staff, but that’s why they’re call temporary and at least they learn very desirable and transferrable skills!

More information: Permanent Job Proves An Elusive Dream (http://tinyurl.com/3ynazb)

Rob

That’s one reason why it’s much easier to “do lean” when a firm is growing, so freed up resources can be dedicated to growth and new business. See Toyota and GM.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType