Value and People: More with More, Less with Less, More with Less, Less with More

icahnIn a very tough economic environment, it is inevitable that everyday people like you and me will be impacted. Gyrations in demand — which is often a product of our own creation (i.e., the bullwhip effect) and not a natural result of supply and demand — will lead companies to make the tough decision to do one of the following:

  1. Add more value with more people
  2. Add less value with less people
  3. Add more value with less people
  4. Add less value with more people

Lean thinkers will often follow (1) or (3), whereas most companies are often guilty of (2) and (4).  It is clear that most companies hack at the branches instead of striking at the root, when it comes to corporate waste.

Carl Icahn — a person I admire — recently wrote about the state of American businesses and how most companies are full of waste. He said:

I have observed first-hand the sheer amount of waste and inefficiency at a few companies that I have taken over.

For instance, when I took over a rail freight car company called ACF during the 1980s, they had 12 floors in a Manhattan office building which was filled with workers. I couldn’t figure out what they did. I really tried to find out what these people did and even went so far as to pay $500,000 to a consultant to study the issue and get back to me. After weeks of research, even the consultant couldn’t figure it out. So I shut down the division and it had no discernable impact on the performance of the company, which I own to this day.

This experience, in my view, is emblematic of the extent of waste in corporate America. There are few companies that you can’t come in and cut 30 percent of operating costs and no one would know the difference.

Icahn highlights several types of wastes here:

Hidden Factories is a term I’ve used in the past to highlight processes, activites, and other associated business waste that become the norm, but are truly waste when seen from the perspective of an outsider or — even more appropriate — from the perspective of the customer.

What is Value?

To explain “value”, it is often easier to explain the opposite — waste or muda.

There are 3 types of activities, 2 of which produce waste:

  1. Steps that definitely create value.
  2. Steps that create no value, but are necessary given the current state of the system.
  3. Steps that create no value and can be eliminated.

(2) & (3) naturally create wastes, of which there are 7 types:

  1. Over-Production: Producing more than is needed, faster than needed or before needed.
  2. Wait-time: Idle time that occurs when co-dependent events are not synchronized.
  3. Transportation: Any material movement that does not directly support immediate production.
  4. Processing: Redundant effort (production or communication) which adds no value to a product or service.
  5. Inventory: Any supply in excess of process or demand requirements.
  6. Motion: Any movement of people which does not contribute added value to the product or service.
  7. Defect: Repair or rework of a product or service to fulfill customer requirements.

It’s important to understand “Value” in terms of the customer. From the customer’s perspective, “Value” could be defined in the form of a question:

Which process steps (and associated costs) do our customers not have to bear?

The answer to that question will define the non-value added steps that ought to be eliminated or reduced in order to bring more value to the customer.

The Big Mura

A type of waste that is quite harmful to the human spirit is the waste of human potential, often called Mura. Carl Icahn describes Mura in the citation above — an entire floor of workers that really were not needed, or, could be needed if deployed in the right way. In either case, the firm probably should not have hired those workers in the first place if, in the short-term, they would not be needed after all.

Listen to Icahn and Choose

Back to what I said in the beginning — some firms will choose one of the following:

  1. Add more value with more people
  2. Add less value with less people
  3. Add more value with less people
  4. Add less value with more people

Lean thinkers will often follow (3), whereas most companies are often guilty of (4) and (2). We often are the creators of the complexity and waste that repulses us and that we complain about. What would the customer have us do? I guarantee customers — in the most generic sense of the word — will probably answer (1) or (3). Yet, companies often commit (2) and (4).

Let the customer appropriately drive our behavior — it’s the only sure way to add value.

+++++

Articles on Ethnography and Design:

  1. Feature? What Feature?
  2. Simplify The Product
  3. Ask Aza Raskin
  4. Aza Raskin on Poka-Yoke & The Humane Interface
  5. Aza Raskin on Quasimodal Design and The ATM
  6. Aza on Feature-Bloat and Site Clutter
  7. Aza on Google Search Results Page
  8. Aza on Cooperation and Team Size
  9. Design Thinking in Medicine
  10. On Designing a Watering Can for Little Hands
  11. Queueing Theory and Visual Management
  12. An Interview with the Inventor of “Clocky”
  13. Bad Breath but Good Design
  14. What is Ethnography

Articles on Leadership:

  1. Overmanaged and Underled
  2. Colin Powell on Leadership
  3. Team or Staff?
  4. Tipping-Point Leadership
  5. Abraham Lincoln on Leadership
  6. How to transform an Organization: Chime-in Before Buy-in

Articles on Queueing Theory:

Articles on Operations, lean and six sigma:


Short URL: http://bit.ly/5HqA

Share This Post:



  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • email

2-pizza teams (10)
3 C's (3)
5S (38)
A3 Report (9)
adoption (7)
agile/software (59)
ajax (4)
amazon (53)
apple (3)
apple iphone (7)
axiom (3)
Aza Raskin (9)
backcountry.com (2)
berlin (1)
bill gates (1)
bill marriott (1)
blog tag (1)
book reviews (4)
bullwhip effect (5)
business (394)
business plans (3)
busm361 (13)
BzzAgent (12)
call center and queueing (11)
car buying (2)
Carbonite (1)
change management (5)
chicago (1)
click fraud (1)
click-to-ship (21)
clocky (2)
colin powell (2)
community (2)
company interviews (18)
company interviews (6)
complexity (32)
costs (8)
culture (7)
customer experience (10)
customer obsession (52)
customer recovery function (1)
customer segmentation (8)
customer service (17)
design thinking (14)
digg (4)
drum-buffer-rope (38)
dublin (1)
dynamic systems (24)
eBay (6)
economics (3)
efficiency (4)
ethnography (29)
family (18)
featuritis (15)
flexibility (1)
forecasting (2)
four performance dimensions (2)
Fun With The 2×2 Matrix (1)
game theory (7)
Gemba (67)
genchi genbutsu (68)
general (135)
germany (1)
google (15)
heijunka (65)
holidays (1)
hoshin kanri (1)
how to be a human (1)
IDEO (2)
image uploading (1)
iphone (5)
ishikawa (69)
IT at Toyota (67)
just-in-time (4)
kaizen (4)
kanban (46)
law of instinct (1)
Leadership (43)
lean (165)
Lean Consumption Maps (98)
learning curve (1)
licketyship (1)
mark cuban (1)
martin luther king (1)
mary poppendieck (1)
metrics (73)
microsoft (6)
milton friedman (1)
moving average (1)
muda (68)
nba fines (1)
net promoter score (nps) (1)
obeya (39)
Off-Topic (1)
onstar (1)
operations (108)
pageviews (3)
pareto principle (39)
patent (1)
peanut butter manifesto (2)
philosophy (3)
Poka-Yoke (6)
poppendieck (3)
powerpoint sucks (2)
private equity (4)
process measures (6)
product development (20)
productivity (4)
quality (41)
quasimodal design (1)
queueing theory (41)
Raffle (1)
rational choice (2)
regression analysis (18)
respect for people (6)
root cause analysis (60)
sarah+palin (2)
seth godin (1)
simplicity principle (10)
six sigma (128)
snowboarding (2)
social media (3)
spam (1)
statistical process control (46)
strategy (46)
suburban (1)
supply chain (24)
takt time (8)
teaching (2)
team size (9)
technology (104)
the beer distribution game (1)
the profit tree (7)
The Visual Factory (11)
theory of constraints (41)
time (2)
timeline (3)
tony+hsieh (11)
toyota (75)
travel (1)
trump bankruptcy (1)
turnaround (5)
twitter (8)
uspto (1)
utah deal flow (2)
variation (69)
venture capital (1)
Visual Management (11)
waste (59)
website traffic (2)
Wing Chun (2)
wisdom of crowds (1)
wisdom teeth (1)
word-of-mouth marketing (18)
yahoo (2)
zappos.com (12)
zero defects (3)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

Hi Pete,

If more people were thinking like us, it would be great.

I’ve seen so much waste, so much effort spent on the wrong direction and plenty of work wasted in 5 mn (the time needed to tell the people that their last 13 months of work has been dump in the garbage. Not me).

Terrible.

Nice article. Btw I’m been reading Atlas Shrugged now. It seems to be a dilemma as old as the world…

Why this tendancy to waste?

A.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Additional comments powered by BackType