Featured Image

Interested in a free 25+ page eBook on the 7 Wastes?

Topics covered are the 7 Wastes in:

Software Engineering, Human Resources, Affiliate Marketing, Paid Search Marketing, the Office, Customer Service, the Environment, Product Development, and Medical Billing


47,176 other people have already downloaded it!

You are here: Lean Six Sigma Home » Operations Management » Process Measures — Productivity and Efficiency

Process Measures — Productivity and Efficiency

by Pete Abilla on February 2, 2007

Part of managing processes is to measure their performance.  This article will discuss 2 basic process measures: Productivity and Efficiency.

Worker Productivity

Simply, productivity is measured like this:

Productivity = Outputs / Inputs

For instance,

Productivity Example
Quantity $/Unit
Car X 4000 $8,000
Car Y 6000 $9,500
Labor Hours for X 20,000 $12/Hour
Labor Hours for Y 30,000 $14/Hour

What is the labor productivity in Hours for each car type?

Car X: (4,000 cars / 20,000 Hours) = 0.2 Cars / Hour
Car Y: (6,000 cars / 30,000 Hours) = 0.2 Cars / Hour

How about in labor Productivity in Dollars?

Car X: [(4,000 * $8,000) / (20,000 * $12)] = $133.33 / Car
Car Y: [(6,000 * $9,500) / (30,000 * $14)] = $135.71 / Car

So, based on the data set above, it appears that Productivity by Hours, both Car X and Car Y are the same; but, Productivity by Dollars, Car X is cheaper to make given the labor hours and hourly rate.

gauri nanda tocky

nanda gauri clocky

How is this practical?  Below is a direct citation from the Harbour Report, 1998:

Labor hours needed for stamping, power train, and assembly operations:

Harbour Report
(100% Nissan 27.6 hours
(168%) GM 46.5 hours
(126%) Ford 34.7 hours

If GM could operate at Nissan’s level of productivity, they’d save themselves about $4.4 Billion Per Year.  Measured another way, GM has about 55,000 more workers than it needs.

Worker Efficiency

Efficiency is measured with the following equation:

Efficiency = [100% * (actual output / standard output)]

Standard Output in the equation above is a number that is arrived at by looking at historical data for the job and by experience.  One would hope that that number is not an arbitrary one, but a number that is derived by looking at a historical time series.

Here’s an example:

Shmula’s Bodywork does automotive collision work.   An insurance agency, using actuarial data, has determined that the standard time to replace a fender is 2.5 hours (ie, “standard output” = 0.4 fenders per hour), and is willing to pay Shmula $50 per hour for labor (parts and supplies are billed separately).  Shmula pays its workers $35 per hour.

Suppose Shmula’s workers take 4 hours to replace a fender.  What is Shmula’s labor hour efficiency?  Given Shmula’s labor costs, will Shmula make money on the job?

Using the equation and the data above, we get:

(1 fender / 4 hours) / (1 fender / 2.5 hours) = .625 * 100% = 62.5% efficiency

2.5 hours * $50 = $125 paid by insurance
4 hours * $35 = $140 costs

Shmula will lose $15 per fender.

Economic Profits are important to Shmula; Given the answer above, how efficient does Shmula need to be to break even?

[($125) / ($35/hour)] = 3.57 hours to Break Even

We know that, Efficiency = 100% * (actual output / standard output).  So,

(1 fender / 3.57 hours) / (1 fender / 2.5 hours) = .7003 * 100% = 70.03% efficiency.  Shmula will need to improve efficiency to 70% or better to make money.

Often times, I hear people use the phrases “productivity” and “efficiency” carelessly, not completely understanding what they mean.  These terms have technical definitions and are very practical for business.  Still, given the explanation above, one must excercise good judgement in detemining which processes ought to be measured by Productivity and Efficiency and balance these measures with other items that might be important to the individual, firm, and industry.  Some measures might make sense for some activities, but not others.


This post was written by

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Mark Graban February 5, 2007 at 1:05 pm

What about quality?

Reply

Andres Naranjo February 20, 2007 at 8:48 pm

I agree on these having standard definitions that people try to recreate. Nothing like a gorup trying to reinvent the wheel.
Based on my experience however, I would say that productivity and efficiency are measures of an overall operation that comprises a set of processes.
Specific business processes, at strategic, core or supporting level are best measured around their time, cost, and quality drivers. Their “measure types” need to be around result measures (that show a completed cycle) or activity measures, which are linked to a specific activity within the process.
There are also extended process dimensions beyond time, cost, quality; which include data, compliance, risk, ownership, benefits. These might need to be measured as well.
Great blog btw.
anv – http://www.andresnaranjo.com

Reply

hector August 20, 2009 at 6:59 am

I think your post is quite wrong as productivity is just another name for efficiency: pls read some definitions or wikipedia for example.
the particular RATIO OF ACCOMPLISHMENT you mention (“actual output / standard output”) has nothing to do with efficiency. It is actually closer to EFFICACY: which is “accomplishment” ie WHAT IS ACHIEVED; vs efficiency : HOW it is achieved: how many resources are being used for the given result(ie productivity). Nevertheless besides of the name given to your ratios, your reasoning seems good

Reply

nospam December 12, 2011 at 4:53 pm

I’m not sure these terms have ever really been defined in the context of business. I’ve googled everywhere for the difference, because I figured there should be a difference. The problem is that your post contradicts at least 4 other blogs on the internet trying to explain the difference. Just google for ‘productivity v.s. efficiency’ and see how everyone is saying something different.

So given the fact that no one seems to know, I have no reason to trust what you say. Wikipedia is not a valid cite for something controversial like this. Go to google books and find a definition; now that would be acceptable.

If you can find a proper citation from a business text or process management I would be grateful and I would be happy to propagate that knowledge. As it stands now however, I see no reason to believe your definition over anyone else’s

Reply

Leave a Comment



search terms for this article:

productivity vs efficiency, productivity and efficiency, efficiency vs productivity, productivity efficiency, efficiency and productivity, productivity calculation formula, process measures, efficiency productivity, process cycle efficiency formula, productivity versus efficiency, process measure, productivity calculation, efficiency measures, how to measure efficiency, how to measure process efficiency